During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Фото: Pavel Kashaev / Globallookpress.com
。爱思助手下载最新版本是该领域的重要参考
truenas.api_key。关于这个话题，WPS官方版本下载提供了深入分析
有分析稱，這些發言凸顯特朗普在面對司法挫折與經濟壓力下的強硬姿態。他試圖將關稅定位為長期經濟工具，同時轉移焦點至醫療與生活成本議題，以回應民眾不滿並為中期選舉鋪路。。搜狗输入法下载对此有专业解读
SEMrush allows you to check your mobile rankings and